Evidence Hub

Impact of Sequencing of Androgen Suppression and Radiation Therapy on Testosterone Recovery in Localized Prostate Cancer

Roy S, Grimes S, Eapen L, Spratt DE, Malone J, Craig J, Morgan SC, Malone S

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized trial to determine the influence of sequencing of radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on posttreatment testosterone recovery and implications of testosterone recovery on subsequent relapse.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with localized prostate cancer with Gleason score ≤7, clinical stage T1b to T3a, and prostate-specific antigen 10.5 nmol/L in patients with baseline ≥10.5 nmol/L or to baseline level in patients with baseline 1.7 nmol/L), and to FTR was compared between the arms using a truncation time point of 36 months.

RESULTS: The adjusted difference in RMST to supracastrate testosterone between the CAHT and NHT arm was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.5; P = .005). No difference was noted in RMST to FTR between the arms (18.7 vs 18.5 months, adjusted difference: 0.5; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.4; P = .61). There was no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect (interaction P = .76) on risk of relapse over subgroups stratified by testosterone recovery to supracastrate level at 15 months after start of ADT. Based on a multistate Markov model, no independent effect of time to FTR on risk of subsequent relapse was observed (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be counseled that an additional 12 months on average is needed for FTR to occur after treatment with prostate radiation therapy and 6 months of ADT. This is independent of the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free