Evidence Hub

Long-Term Follow-Up of Neoadjuvant Enzalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Neoadjuvant Feasibility Trial

Millan B, Pramod N, Blachman-Braun R, Saini J, Loebach L, Patel M, Gurram S, Turkbey B et al.

The Prostate, 2026

39 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant intense androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) has shown pathologic complete responses (pCR) in prostate cancer (PCa), but long-term survival outcomes remain unclear. This study evaluates the durability of response following neoadjuvant ADT plus enzalutamide before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and lymph node dissection.

METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of an open-label feasibility trial enrolling men with NCCN intermediate-, high-, very high-risk localized and regional PCa treated with 6 months of neoadjuvant ADT and enzalutamide. Factors associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and metastases were evaluated using appropriate univariable statistical tests, and BCR-, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS: Of 39 patients enrolled, 36 patients completed all study interventions. Eighteen (66.7%) patients had NCCN very high-risk disease or clinical regional lymph nodes on imaging. Four patients (11.1%) achieved pCR, although two (5.6%) developed BCR. One patient (2.8%) had M1 and three (8.3%) had N1 disease on final pathology, and all four developed metastases. Eleven (30.6%) patients received salvage therapy, with all but one receiving ADT with radiation. Factors associated with BCR included biopsy ISUP grade and positive surgical margins, while NCCN risk group, biopsy ISUP grade, perineural…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 39 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free