Evidence Hub

Statin use and outcomes in advanced prostate cancer:Secondary analysis of the SPARTAN trial

Mousa A, Chavarriaga J, Lajkosz K, Penn LZ, Khurram N, Hamilton RJ

Urologic oncology, 2026

1,207 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of statin use on survival outcomes in the phase III SPARTAN trial of apalutamide for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from all 1,207 SPARTAN participants, identifying baseline statin users and matching them 1:1 to nonusers using propensity scores. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival (MFS), compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for key covariates, was applied to the matched cohort to assess associations between statin use and survival outcomes.

RESULTS: Of the 1,207 SPARTAN participants, 463 (38%) were baseline statin users; 456 users were propensity matched to 456 nonusers with balanced characteristics. Statin and nonstatin users were similarly distributed across treatment arms. While statin use was not associated with differences in metastasis-free survival (MFS) overall (P = 0.64), we observed a significant interaction by treatment arm (P = 0.018), with statin use linked to worse MFS in the placebo group (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.40, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.04-1.88). Statin use was also not associated with secondary endpoints overall, but again showed interaction for anticancer therapy-free survival, with harm in the placebo group (HR 1.32) and benefit in the apalutamide group (HR 0.79).

CONCLUSION: In this secondary analysis of the SPARTAN trial, statin use was not associated with improved…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,207 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free