Evidence Hub

Prevalence of polycythaemia with different formulations of testosterone therapy in transmasculine individuals

Nolan BJ, Leemaqz SY, Ooi O, Cundill P, Silberstein N, Locke P, Grossmann M, Zajac JD et al.

Internal medicine journal, 2021

180 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Masculinising hormone therapy with testosterone is used to align an individual's physical characteristics with his or her gender identity. Testosterone therapy is typically administered via intramuscular or transdermal routes, and polycythaemia is the most common adverse event.

AIMS: To compare the risk of polycythaemia with different formulations of testosterone therapy in transmasculine individuals.

METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was undertaken of transmasculine individuals at a primary and secondary care clinic in Melbourne, Australia. A total of 180 individuals who were on testosterone therapy for >6 months was included. Groups included those receiving: (i) intramuscular testosterone undecanoate (n = 125); (ii) intramuscular testosterone enantate (n = 31); or (iii) transdermal testosterone (n = 24). Outcome was prevalence of polycythaemia (defined as haematocrit > 0.5).

RESULTS: Mean age was 28.4 (8.8) years, with a median duration of testosterone therapy of 37.7 (24.2) months; 27% were smokers. There was no difference between groups in serum total testosterone concentration measured. While there was no difference between groups in haematocrit, there was a higher proportion of patients with polycythaemia in those who were on intramuscular testosterone enantate (23.3%) than on transdermal testosterone (0%), P = 0.040. There was no statistically significant difference in polycythaemia between intramuscular testosterone undecanoate (15%) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 180 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free