Evidence Hub

Trends and Patterns of Testosterone Therapy among U.S. Male Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999 to 2014

Zhou CK, Advani S, Chaloux M, Gibson JT, Yu M, Bradley M, Hoover RN, Cook MB

The Journal of urology, 2020

Abstract

PURPOSE: We explored the Medicare database (1999 to 2014) to provide a comprehensive assessment of testosterone therapy patterns in the older U.S. male population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated annual age-standardized incidence (new users) and prevalence (existing users) of testosterone therapy according to demographic characteristics, comorbidities and potential indications.

RESULTS: There were 392,698 incident testosterone therapy users during 88 million person-years. Testosterone therapy users were predominantly younger, white nonHispanic, and located in South and West U.S. Census regions. On average testosterone therapy use increased dramatically during 2007 to 2014 (average annual percent change 15.5%), despite a decrease in 2014. In 2014 the most common recorded potential indications for any testosterone therapy were hypogonadism (48%), fatigue (18%), erectile dysfunction (15%), depression (4%) and psychosexual dysfunction (1%). Laboratory tests to measure circulating testosterone concentrations for testosterone therapy were infrequent with 35% having had at least 1 testosterone test in the 120 days preceding testosterone therapy, 4% the recommended 2 pre-testosterone therapy tests, and 16% at least 1 pre-testosterone therapy test and at least 1 post-testosterone therapy test.

CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone therapy remains common in the older U.S. male population, despite a recent decrease. Although testosterone therapy prescriptions are predominantly for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free