Evidence Hub

Long-term testosterone undecanoate replacement therapy: Impact of ethnicity

Kempegowda P, Quinn LM, Chandan JS, Shepherd L, Kauser S, Rahim A, Bates A

Clinical endocrinology, 2020

50 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is indicated for symptomatic male hypogonadism. However, the safety and efficacy profiles across different ethnicities for long-term TRT remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of ethnicity on various biochemical parameters following testosterone undecanoate (TU) replacement.

METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 50 male patients treated with TU from 2006 to 2017 in a large secondary care centre was performed. Changes in total testosterone, PSA, haematocrit, haemoglobin, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) over eight years of treatment were analysed. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess differences in these parameters between Caucasians and South Asians.

RESULTS: Thirty-one Caucasians (age: median (IQR) 55.0 years (49.0-68.0); total duration of follow-up 6.1 years (2.9-9.3)) and 19 South Asians (age: median (IQR) 52.0 years (38.0-69.0); duration of follow-up 6.5 years (1.3-8.4)) were treated with TU during the study period. There was no significant difference in total testosterone levels between the two ethnicities. We noted a higher free and bioavailable testosterone in South Asians than Caucasians, albeit within their reference range. PSA was higher in Caucasians than South Asians at two and eight years of TU therapy. After one year of TRT, haematocrit was higher in South Asians than Caucasians at one year, whereas LDL and total cholesterol were significantly higher in Caucasians than South…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free