Evidence Hub

Circulating dihydrotestosterone, testosterone, and free testosterone levels and dihydrotestosterone-to-testosterone ratios in healthy women across the menstrual cycle

Huang G, Bhasin S, Pencina K, Cheng M, Jasuja R

Fertility and sterility, 2022

13 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the circulating androgen levels across the menstrual cycle in healthy women using highly sensitive and accurate methods and report sex differences in the relative levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) to testosterone (T) levels.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

SETTING: Research clinic, academic teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S): Twenty-one healthy premenopausal women, aged 19-40 years, with regular menstrual cycles.

INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum total T and DHT levels measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, free T levels measured using a standardized equilibrium dialysis method coupled with measurement of the T levels in the dialysate using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and comparison of the DHT-to-T ratio between healthy women and age-matched healthy men.

RESULT(S): The serum total and free T levels increased across the follicular phase and peaked at midcycle (total T, 43.6 ± 16.2 ng/dL; free T, 15.6 ± 11.9 pg/mL) and gradually declined in the luteal phase. The DHT level did not significantly change across the menstrual cycle. The DHT-to-T ratios were 1:4 and 1:13 in women and men, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S): In healthy premenopausal women, the total and free T levels varied significantly across the menstrual cycle, whereas the DHT levels did not change; the peak total and free T levels in the midcycle period were higher than previously reported, underscoring the importance of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free