Evidence Hub

Predictors of clomiphene citrate response in the treatment of men with testosterone deficiency

Kim DJ, Assel M, Elshafei A, Liso N, Vickers AJ, Mulhall JP, Flores JM

The journal of sexual medicine, 2026

292 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is an established treatment for men with low testosterone, but predictors of treatment response remain poorly defined.

AIM: To identify factors associated with clinically meaningful increases in serum testosterone levels during CC therapy.

METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed men diagnosed with low testosterone and treated with CC. Inclusion criteria were (1) a diagnosis of low testosterone (total testosterone (TT) ≤300 ng/dL with symptoms) or borderline low testosterone (TT 300-400 ng/dL with objective signs of low testosterone (low bone density or elevated HbA1c)), (2) laboratory follow-up within 12-weeks of initiation, and (4) no prior testosterone therapy. Initial CC dosing was 25 mg every other day (QOD), with escalation to 50 mg QOD if TT remained <400 ng/dL. Labs were redrawn every 4-weeks following dose changes until TT was at goal or until CC discontinuation. Discontinuation within 12-weeks without documented response constituted treatment failure. TT was assessed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Multivariable models were used to identify predictors of treatment response.

OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was achievement of treatment response, defined as TT ≥400 ng/dL on treatment plus an increase in TT ≥200 ng/dL from baseline.

RESULTS: The study included 292 men with median age of 60 (IQR 50, 66) years, median baseline TT (219, 314) 264 ng/dL, and median baseline luteinizing hormone (LH) of 3.5 (2.6, 5.1) mIU/mL.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 292 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free