Evidence Hub

Association of preoperative testosterone replacement therapy with postoperative complications following rotator cuff repair

Lawand J, Mirahmadi A, Holle AM, Parmar RP, Elias T, Somerson J, Hill B, Khan A et al.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2026

673,982 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is increasingly performed due to advancements in surgical techniques and an aging population. While generally successful, complications like re-tear, stiffness, infection, and thromboembolic events remain concerns. The rising use of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in middle-aged and older men raises questions about its impact on surgical outcomes, as its effect on RCR complications remains unclear.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver Database. Patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR between January 2010 and April 2023 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 29827. Those with at least two years of continuous follow-up were included, while patients under 21 or with unknown procedural laterality were excluded. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: those who received TRT within three months preoperatively and a control group who did not. Propensity score matching (1:1, caliper = 0.001) was performed to control for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, obesity, tobacco use, and hypogonadism. The primary outcomes included 2-year postoperative complications and reoperations. Secondary outcomes included 90-day major medical complications such as surgical site infection, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection, wound dehiscence, sepsis, acute kidney injury, and readmissions. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests, and odds…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 673,982 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free