Evidence Hub

Differential Endocrine and Metabolic Effects of Testosterone Suppressive Agents in Transgender Women

Sofer Y, Yaish I, Yaron M, Bach MY, Stern N, Greenman Y

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2020

126 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Suppression of testosterone secretion and/or action in transgender women using cyproterone acetate (CPA), spironolactone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GA) is achieved through various mechanisms. Our objective was to characterize possible differential effects of these compounds on metabolic and endocrine variables.

METHODS: We conducted a historic cohort study of transgender patients treated in a tertiary referral center. A longitudinal analysis of treatment naïve patients and a cross-sectional analysis of the whole cohort at the last visit was carried out.

RESULTS: Among 126 transgender women (75 treatment-naïve), CPA was the predominant androgen suppressive therapy (70%), followed by spironolactone (17.6%), and GA (10.2%). Among those who were treatment-naïve, the increase in serum prolactin levels over baseline was greater at 3 months following CPA initiation (mean change 397 ± 335 mIU/L) than following spironolactone (20.1 ± 87 mIU/L) or GA initiation (64.6 ± 268 mIU/L; P = .0002). Prolactin levels remained higher in the CPA-treated group throughout follow-up, irrespective of estradiol levels, which were similar between the groups. A worse metabolic profile was associated with treatment with CPA than with spironolactone or GA. In the CPA compared to the spironolactone and GA groups, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were lower (47.1 ± 10.4, 54.4 ± 12.2, and 60.3 ± 13, respectively; P = .0076), while body mass index levels (24.3 ± 5,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 126 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free