Evidence Hub

Testosterone and androstenedione are positively associated with anti-Müllerian hormone in premenopausal women

Islam RM, Bell RJ, Skiba MA, Davis SR

Clinical endocrinology, 2021

794 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document associations between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and circulating androgens in nonhealthcare-seeking premenopausal women.

DESIGN: Community-based, cross-sectional study.

SETTING: Eastern states of Australia.

PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 18-39 years not using systemic hormones, not pregnant or breastfeeding within 3 months, and not postmenopausal.

MEASUREMENTS: AMH, measured by the Beckman Access 2, 2 site immunometric assay from fresh samples, and testosterone, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and 11-oxygenated C19 steroids, measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS: Data were available for 794 women, median age of 33 years (range: 18-39). 76.1% were of European ancestry and 48.2% were parous. Serum AMH was positively associated with testosterone (rho = .29, p < .001) androstenedione (rho = .39, p < .001) and DHEA (rho = .10, p = .005) but not 11-ketoandrostenedione or 11-ketotestosterone. When adjusted for age, body mass index and smoking, using quantile regression, independent positive associations remained between AMH and testosterone (β coefficient: 20.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.79-28.03; p < .001) and androstenedione (β coefficient: 5.90, 95% CI: 3.76-8.03; p < .001). The serum concentration of testosterone was greater at the top AMH quintile than other quintiles (0.56 nmol/L [range: 0.21-1.90] vs. 0.36 nmol/L [range: 0.13-0.87]; p = .001) in women with self-reported polycystic ovary syndrome.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 794 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free