Evidence Hub

The effect of empagliflozin on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease

Hershenson R, Nardi-Agmon I, Leshem-Lev D, Kornowski R, Eisen A

Cardiovascular diabetology, 2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with premature atherosclerotic disease, coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic heart failure (HF), leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i) exhibit cardioprotective benefits beyond glucose lowering, reducing the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and HF hospitalizations in patients with DM and CAD. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone marrow-derived cells involved in vascular repair, mobilized in response to vascular injury. The number and function of circulating EPCs (cEPCs) are negatively affected by cardiovascular risk factors, including DM. This study aimed to examine the response of cEPCs to SGLT2i treatment in DM patients with stable CAD.

METHODS: A prospective single-center study included patients with DM and stable CAD who were started on an SGLT2i (empagliflozin). Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months to evaluate cEPC levels and function by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and MTT assays.

RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in the study (median age 73, (IQR 69, 77) years, 67% male). After 1 month of treatment with empagliflozin, there was no significant change in cEPCs level or function. However, following 3 months of treatment, a significant increase was observed both in cell levels (CD34(+)/VEGFR-2(+): from 0.49% (IQR 0.32, 0.64) to 1.58% (IQR 0.93, 1.82), p = 0.0006; CD133(+)/VEGFR-2(+): from…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free