Evidence Hub

Renal and cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibitors among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Javier RM, Faizin I, Andiani, Samudra D, Puspitasari RA, Dharma AS, Nurpradika BY, Amalia F et al.

International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026

5,436 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is frequently complicated by hypertension, a dual contributor to disease progression and cardiovascular risk. Despite standard therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, residual risk remains high. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a novel therapy with proven renal and cardiovascular benefits, but their effects in hypertensive CKD patients remain less well defined.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD patients with baseline systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or renovascular disease. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 2024. Eligible RCTs compared an SGLT2 inhibitor versus placebo and reported outcomes in hypertensive subgroups. Primary outcome was a composite of kidney failure, sustained decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR ≥40-50 %), or cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included kidney-specific endpoints, cardiovascular composite outcomes, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using random-effects models.

Results: Three RCTs were included: CREDENCE (canagliflozin), DAPA-CKD (dapagliflozin), and EMPA-KIDNEY (empagliflozin), encompassing 5436 hypertensive participants. For the primary outcome, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced risk compared with placebo (OR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.65-0.88). Kidney…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,436 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free