Evidence Hub

Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors Among Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study

Lim CE, Pasternak B, Eliasson B, Pazzagli L, Ueda P

The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026

72,698 participants

Abstract

Background: GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors improve cardiometabolic risk factors in type 1 diabetes, but lack approval, partly due to safety concerns. We aimed to assess the use of these drugs in a national population of patients with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Using Swedish nationwide registers, we included all patients aged ≥18 years with type 1 diabetes, 2007-2024. We calculated yearly prevalence of GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor use based on prescription fills; the proportion of patients with elevated HbA1c or obesity, without receiving any of the drugs; and diabetic ketoacidosis incidence among SGLT2 inhibitor users.

Findings: 72,698 patients were included (median (IQR) age in 2024: 48 (33, 63) years). Use of the drugs increased during the study period and reached 5.5% (3220/58,564) in 2024 for GLP-1 receptor agonists and 0.9% (552/58,564) for SGLT2 inhibitors (peak in 2022: 1.1% [610/55,949]). In 2024, 24.5% (14,348/58,564) of patients had HbA1c of ≥64 mmol/mol (≥8.0%) and 16.8% (9839/58,564) had obesity and were not treated with either drug. Among 1291 first-time SGLT2 inhibitor users, the on-treatment incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis was 24.9 (95% CI 18.4-31.5) events per 1000 person-years.

Interpretation: Use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors in type 1 diabetes remained low (5.5% and 0.9% in 2024), with many untreated patients having suboptimal cardiometabolic risk factors. While ancillary treatment could potentially improve…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 72,698 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free