Evidence Hub

Effects of exercises based on ACSM recommendations on patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Shi X, Liu F, Song R, Guo X, Huang J, Chen J, Gao H

Frontiers in physiology, 2026

1,490 participants

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise training following the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines on exercise capacity, quality of life, and left ventricular function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing exercise interventions with usual care in patients with HFpEF. Primary outcomes included exercise capacity (6-MWT, Peak VO2, quality of life (total score of MLHFQ), LVEF, and diastolic function indicator (E/e' ratio). The included studies were subgrouped for analysis into a high-adherence group (≥70%) and a low/uncertain-adherence group based on their compliance with the ACSM exercise recommendations.

Results: A total of 19 RCT involving 1490 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results demonstrated that exercise training compliant with ACSM guidelines significantly improved exercise capacity, including the 6-MWT (SMD = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.30, P = 0.0008) and Peak VO2 (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.91, P 2 (P = 0.003). Although the high-adherence group obtained larger effect sizes for MLHFQ scores and LVEF, the between-group differences did not reach statistical significance. No significant intergroup differences were found in other diastolic function indicators.

Conclusion: This study indicates that implementing the ACSM-recommended exercise…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,490 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free