Evidence Hub

Comparative Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors in MASLD: Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of CAP-LSM Outcomes and Time Effects

Gomez DP, Hababag WF, Ong-Ramos CC

JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026

855 participants

Abstract

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common chronic liver disorder worldwide. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucose-lowering agents with cardiovascular benefits, have shown hepatoprotective potential. Their comparative effects on steatosis and fibrosis, their interrelationship, and the role of treatment duration remain uncertain.

Objectives: To compare the effects of individual SGLT2 inhibitors on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, and to assess correlations between controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), as well as the impact of treatment duration.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in MASLD were synthesized using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Hepatic steatosis (CAP) and fibrosis (LSM) were analyzed separately as mean differences (MDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Prespecified study-level effect modifiers were evaluated using Bayesian network meta-regression. Comparative rankings were derived using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Trial-level concordance between CAP and LSM was assessed using bivariate Bayesian meta-analysis.

Results: Fourteen RCTs (n = 855) were included. Compared with standard care, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced CAP (MD 10.48 dB/m; 95% CrI 0.53 to 18.72) and LSM (MD 0.57 kPa; 95% CrI 0.02 to 1.12). Dapagliflozin showed the most consistently favorable estimates across both outcomes. Trial-level…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 855 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free