Evidence Hub

Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes, Symptoms, Functional Capacity, and Cardiac Remodeling in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Multidomain Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Bodea OM, Serban S, Craciun ML, Mateescu DM, Florescu E, Muresan CO, Cotet IG, Badalica-Petrescu M et al.

Journal of clinical medicine, 2026

23,812 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: SGLT2 inhibitors are key therapies in heart failure (HF), but their combined multidomain effects have not been analyzed together. Methods: We conducted a PROSPERO-registered (CRD420251235850) systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2i (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, sotagliflozin) with placebo in adults with HF, regardless of ejection fraction or diabetes status. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science through 1 February 2025. Outcomes were grouped into four domains: (1) clinical events, (2) symptoms/health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, KCCQ), (3) functional capacity (6 min walk distance, peak VO2), and (4) cardiac remodeling/energetics (cardiac MRI, 31P-MRS). We used random-effects models with Hartung-Knapp adjustment and assessed heterogeneity by I2 and prediction intervals. Results: Eleven RCTs with 23,812 patients (HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF, and acute or recently decompensated HF) were included. SGLT2i lowered the risk of cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization by 23% (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82; p 2 = 28%; prediction interval 0.68-0.87), with similar effects across ejection fraction, diabetes status, and presentation type. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality dropped by 12% (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.96) and 14% (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95), respectively. SGLT2i improved KCCQ-Clinical Summary Score by 4.6 points (95% CI 3.4-5.8; p p =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 23,812 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free