Evidence Hub

Cardiovascular outcomes of SGLT-2 inhibitors' subtypes in type 2 diabetes; an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ebrahimi P, Soleimani H, Mahalleh M, Farisi P, Taheri M, Ramezani P, Soltani P, Nazari R et al.

Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025

70,830 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The effects of Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on cardiac outcomes, cardiovascular mortality (CVM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients have been reported heterogeneously in different studies.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scholar databases were searched with relevant MeSH terms from January 1, 2010, to November 14, 2023. The study used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcomes in all trials included the risk of ACM, CVM, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) in T2DM patients who were treated with one of the SGLT-2 inhibitors. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I2 tests. The Egger's test was used to check for publication bias.

Results: Eighteen studies, including 70,830 participants, were included. A pooled estimate showed that SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment was significantly associated with reduced ACM (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.90, p-value: 0.001, I2: 35.1%), CVM (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96, p-value: 0.001, I2: 0%), MI (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79-0.98, p-value: 0.001, I2: 0%), and HHF (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58-0.77, p-value: 0.001). SGL-2 inhibitor treatment had no significant relationship with CVA (stroke) (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.8-1.10, p-value: 0.896). Subgroup analysis showed that the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 70,830 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free