Evidence Hub

Bone Mineral Density in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Velentza L, Filis P, Wilhelmsson M, Kogner P, Herold N, Sävendahl L

Pediatrics, 2024

8,106 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: There is an increasing population of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) at risk for treatment-related toxicities, including skeletal morbidities. Bone mineral density (BMD) is a proxy for bone health and reductions are associated with osteoporosis and fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate bone health in CCS by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of BMD after completed treatments.

DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science in May 2019 and updated in May 2023.

STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting BMD Z-scores measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in CCS after treatment completion.

DATA EXTRACTION: We performed a pooled analysis of studies reporting BMD Z-scores and thereafter we analyzed studies comparing BMD in survivors and healthy controls. All analyses were performed based on the site of BMD measurement.

RESULTS: Of 4243 studies, 84 were included (N = 8106). The mean time off-treatment across the studies ranged from 2 months to 24 years. The overall pooled mean Z-score was -0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.59 to -0.55) in the whole-body, -0.84 (95% CI -0.86 to -0.83) in the lumbar spine, -0.79 (95% CI -0.81 to -0.77) in the femoral neck and -0.14 (95% CI -0.18 to -0.11) in the total hip. When comparing survivors with controls, BMD was significantly lower in survivors at all sites.

LIMITATIONS: English publications, study-level meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: We showed a significant reduction of BMD Z-scores in CCS.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free