Evidence Hub

Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Meta-Analysis

Pray C, Feroz NI, Nigil Haroon N

Calcified tissue international, 2017

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of studies to examine the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Additionally, we evaluated the risk factors of vertebral fractures in AS. Two authors independently searched Embase and Medline for studies that had assessed the risk of fractures in patients with AS. Twenty-two studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. Patients with AS had high frequency of vertebral fractures [OR (95% CI): 1.96 (1.52-2.51)]. Major risk factors for vertebral fractures in patients with AS include low BMD at the femoral neck and total hip, male gender, longer disease duration, higher BASDAI, higher BASRI, and possibly inflammatory bowel disease. The risk of non-vertebral fractures [OR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.04-1.15)] was 10% higher in AS patients than in controls. The risk of hip fractures in AS patients was not statistically significant [OR (95% CI) 1.17 (0.71-1.92)] in our pooled analysis. We found that patients with AS are at high risk of vertebral fractures. Male sex, duration of AS, mSASSS, BASRI, and low BMD at the hip and distal forearm were associated with the risk of vertebral fractures. Current evidence on the risk of hip fractures in patients with AS is inconsistent. Data about the effect of NSAIDs and TNF inhibitors on fracture risk in AS are limited.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free