Evidence Hub

Radiomics for classification of bone mineral loss: A machine learning study

Rastegar S, Vaziri M, Qasempour Y, Akhash MR, Abdalvand N, Shiri I, Abdollahi H, Zaidi H

Diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2020

147 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models to classify osteoporosis, osteopenia and normal patients using radiomics and machine learning approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 147 patients were included in this retrospective single-center study. There were 12 men and 135 women with a mean age of 56.88±10.6 (SD) years (range: 28-87 years). For each patient, seven regions including four lumbar and three femoral including trochanteric, intertrochanteric and neck were segmented on bone mineral densitometry images and 54 texture features were extracted from the regions. The performance of four feature selection methods, including classifier attribute evaluation (CLAE), one rule attribute evaluation (ORAE), gain ratio attribute evaluation (GRAE) and principal components analysis (PRCA) along with four classification methods, including random forest (RF), random committee (RC), K-nearest neighbor (KN) and logit-boost (LB) were evaluated. Four classification categories, including osteopenia vs. normal, osteoporosis vs. normal, osteopenia vs. osteoporosis and osteoporosis+osteopenia vs. osteoporosis were examined for the defined seven regions. The classification model performances were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS: The AUC values ranged from 0.50 to 0.78. The combination of methods RF+CLAE, RF+ORAE and RC+ORAE yielded highest performance (AUC=0.78) in discriminating between osteoporosis and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free