Evidence Hub

Bone mineral acquisition in low calcium intake children following the withdrawal of calcium supplement

Lee WT, Leung SS, Leung DM, Wang SH, Xu YC, Zeng WP, Cheng JC

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 1997

159 participants

Abstract

Our recent 18-month calcium supplementation trial demonstrated a significant increase in radial bone mineral mass in 7-year-old children with calcium intake approximately 300 mg/day (Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60: 744-50). The persistence of higher bone mass after cessation of calcium supplementation is unknown. This is a follow-up study to investigate the lasting effect of calcium supplementation on bone acquisition. Subjects were 159 Chinese children aged 8.7 years. Distal one-third radial bone mineral content (BMC) and bone width (BW) were measured by single-photon absorptiometry. After 12 months, the significant difference in mean +/- SD percentage radial BMC disappeared between the study and control groups (7.34 +/- 6.77% vs 8.67 +/- 6.46%, p > 0.05). Dietary calcium intakes were similar between the groups. During the supplementation phase, the study group had 17.9% greater BMC gain than that of controls. In the follow-up phase, however, the study group had 16.1% less BMC gain than that of controls. It appears that an increased acquisition rate during the supplementation phase was almost balanced by a reduced acquisition rate during follow-up phase. Moreover, throughout the entire 30-month period, the overall BMC acquisition rates of the study and control groups were 25% and 23.8%, respectively. Hence, the overall acquisition rate of the study group was only 5% higher than that of controls. Therefore, the effect of calcium supplementation on bone mineral gain appears to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 159 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free