Bone mineral content and collagen defects in osteogenesis imperfecta
Abstract
Whole-body and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was done in 63 patients with osteogenesis imperfecta aged 5 to 63 y, and the results were compared with OI types and collagen defects. Bone mineral content (BMC)-for-age, bone area (BA)-for-age, bone mineral density (BMD)-for-age, and BMC-for-BA were reduced, especially in patients with OI III/IV and/or in those with a qualitative collagen defect. BA-for-height was normal. Some patients with OI I and/or a quantitative collagen defect had BMD at or above -2 z-scores. We conclude (i) that both BMC and BMD differ significantly between OI types and collagen defects, (ii) that reduced BMC-for-age in OI patients is due mainly to reduced height ("short bones") and reduced BMC-for-BA ("light bones"), whereas BA-for-height ("bone width") is normal, (iii) that most OI patients have lower than average BMC, but in some mildly affected patients brittleness may exist with only small reductions in BMC.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 63 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Development of a crushable foam model for human trabecular bone
- Data-driven motion compensation in HR-pQCT.
- Modeling of structure, quality, and function in the orthodontic patient
- Exploring the mechanism of Heidihuang Pill in the treatment of osteoporosis based on network pharmacology, molecular docking, and experimental validation
- Effect of fabric on the accuracy of computed tomography-based finite element analyses of the vertebra
- Use of interventions involving virtual reality tasks during the climacteric: a systematic review
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.