Evidence Hub

Deep Learning-derived Bone Mineral Density and Longitudinal White Matter Microstructure and Cognitive Decline: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Momtazmanesh S, Hathaway QA, Bancks MP, Bluemke DA, Barr RG, Post WS, Habes M, Nasrallah I et al.

Radiology, 2026

715 participants

Abstract

Background White matter (WM) microstructural degeneration and WM hyperintensities (WMH) are imaging markers of brain aging. Low bone mineral density (BMD) and brain aging co-occur, but longitudinal evidence linking skeletal health to WM injury and cognitive decline remains limited. Purpose To determine whether deep learning-derived thoracic vertebral BMD (vBMD) from noncontrast chest CT is associated with longitudinal changes in WM integrity, WMH burden, and cognitive decline. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a prospective study conducted from September 2016 to March 2024 included participants without clinically recognized cardiovascular disease from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Participants underwent noncontrast chest CT, multimodal brain MRI (diffusion tensor imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery), and cognitive testing. Thoracic vBMD was quantified at baseline using a validated deep learning algorithm. Linear mixed-effects models related baseline vBMD to longitudinal changes in WMH volume, WM fractional anisotropy, and cognition, adjusting for demographics, apolipoprotein E-ε4, cardiometabolic risk factors, lifestyle, and medications. Results This study included 715 participants (median age [IQR], 69 years [65-75 years]; 397 men and 318 women). Lower baseline vBMD was associated with faster decline in total WM fractional anisotropy (n = 405; β = -0.036 SD/year/0.1 g/cm3 vBMD decrease [95% CI: -0.065, -0.006]; nominal P = .02),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 715 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free