Evidence Hub

The utility of changes in serum levels of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen in predicting patient response to oral monthly ibandronate therapy

Hochberg MC, Silverman SL, Barr CE, Miller PD

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 2010

323 participants

Abstract

Bone turnover markers may provide a more rapid indication of patient response to osteoporosis treatment than bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. This post hoc analysis of data from the MOBILE (Monthly Oral iBandronate In LadiEs) study assessed the relationship between increases in BMD at 12 mo from baseline after starting ibandronate treatment and changes in bone resorption marker serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTX) from baseline at 3 and 6 mo. MOBILE enrolled postmenopausal women aged 55-80 yr with mean lumbar spine (LS) BMD T-score of -2.5 to -5.0. This analysis included women who received 150-mg monthly oral ibandronate (n=323). A high proportion of women were classified as BMD responders after 1 yr (BMD increase was >/=0%, i.e., 74-91% depending on skeletal site; BMD increase was >/=3%, i.e., 34-67%). Women with larger decreases in sCTX were more likely to be BMD responders. The percent increase in LS BMD at 12 mo was significantly associated with the percent decrease in sCTX at 3 mo from baseline (Pearson correlation coefficient: -0.19, p=0.0016). In linear regression models, percent decrease in sCTX at 3 mo from baseline was a significant predictor of 1-yr LS BMD response (R(2)=0.61, p=0.0007). These data suggest that 3-mo changes in sCTX levels are associated with 1-yr LS BMD increases in postmenopausal women treated with once-monthly oral ibandronate.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 323 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free