Evidence Hub

Anti-fracture efficacy of vitamin K

Iwamoto J

Clinical calcium, 2009

50 participants

Abstract

The objective of the present review of the literature was to evaluate the effect of vitamin K supplementation on the skeleton of postmenopausal women. PubMed was used to search the reliable literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by using the inclusion criteria: >or= approximately 50 subjects per group and study period of >or= 2 years. The results of 7 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria showed that vitamin K (K(1) and K(2)) supplementation reduced serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin levels regardless of dose, but that it had inconsistent effects on serum total osteocalcin levels and no effect on bone resorption. Despite the lack of a significant change or the occurrence of only a modest increase in bone mineral density, high-dose vitamin K supplementation improved indices of bone strength in the femoral neck and reduced the incidence of clinical fractures. Furthermore, a post hoc analysis in a large RCT in Japan showed that high-dose vitamin K(2) supplementation decreased the subsequent incidence of vertebral fractures in osteoporotic postmenopausal women with a history of at least 5 vertebral fractures. The review of the reliable literature showed the effect of high-dose vitamin K supplementation on the skeleton of postmenopausal women mediated by mechanisms other than bone mineral density and bone turnover.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free