Evidence Hub

Longitudinal Changes in Bone Mineral Measurements Inside and Outside Radiation Fields Used for Cervical Cancer Treatment

Wu J, Lakomy DS, Fellman BM, Salcedo MP, Sood AK, Jhingran A, Klopp AH, Iyer RB et al.

Practical radiation oncology, 2022

78 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the magnitude of changes in bone mineral density (BMD), within and outside the radiation field, among women who received pelvic radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy for cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this secondary analysis of a prospective study, we analyzed serial computed tomography scans and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans from 78 patients who received definitive RT or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for cervical cancer at a single institution from 2008 to 2015. BMD values at L1, L2, L3, and L4 were measured. We compared changes in BMD within the radiation field (ie, at L4) with those outside the field (ie, at L1). Linear mixed models were also used to examine the effect of RT on changes in BMD over time and covariate adjustment.

RESULTS: The median age of the 78 patients was 45.5 years (range, 23-88 years); all received RT and 76 (97%) received concurrent CRT. Treatment was associated with significant declines in BMD in all 4 lumbar vertebral bodies over time (P < .05), with nadir at 3 months for L4 and at 1 year for L1. Pairwise comparisons at 3 months and 2 years after treatment indicated that BMD in L4 (within the RT field) had improved (P = .037), but BMD in L1 (outside the RT field) was no different at 3 months and 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS: Significant BMD declines were observed in all lumbar vertebral bodies immediately after RT. However, in-field vertebral bodies reached nadir BMD earlier than those located outside…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 78 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free