Evidence Hub

Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment goals with denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Cosman F, Wang Z, Li X, Cummings SR

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025

Abstract

BMD levels achieved on osteoporosis treatment are predictive of subsequent fracture risk, and T-score >-2.5 has been proposed as a minimum treatment target for women with osteoporosis. Knowing the likelihood of attaining target T-scores with different medications for different baseline BMD levels can help determine appropriate initial treatment for individual patients. In this post hoc analysis, we estimated the probability of achieving a non-osteoporotic T-score (>-2.5 or ≥-2.0) at the TH or LS in postmenopausal women >60 yr old treated with denosumab for either 3 or 10 yr in the FREEDOM trial and its long-term extension. In women with baseline TH T-scores of -2.7, -3.0, and -3.5, the probabilities of achieving target T-scores >-2.5 with 3 yr of denosumab were 71%, 12%, and 0.1%, respectively. At LS, for baseline T-scores of -2.7, -3.0, and -3.5, the probabilities were 86%, 59%, and 11%, respectively. Longer treatment duration of up to 10 yr increased the probability of achieving target T-scores. The baseline T-scores that permitted at least 50% of women to achieve a target T-score >-2.5 were -2.8 at TH and -3.1 at LS after 3 yr and -3.0 at TH and -3.7 at LS after 10 yr of treatment. To achieve higher treatment targets (T-scores ≥ -2.0), overall probabilities were lower at both skeletal sites, particularly for TH, even with longer treatment duration. Our results demonstrate that the probability of achieving T-score targets with denosumab is dependent on baseline BMD,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free