Evidence Hub

Redefining normal bone and mineral clinical biochemistry reference intervals for healthy infants in Canada

Gallo S, Comeau K, Sharma A, Vanstone CA, Agellon S, Mitchell J, Weiler HA, Rodd C

Clinical biochemistry, 2014

132 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few normative data exist for routine clinical chemistry in healthy term infants, that is, during a time of rapid development. Biochemical markers are significantly affected by these physiological changes and the lack of appropriate reference intervals may impede diagnostics in infants.

OBJECTIVE: To define reference intervals for calcium, phosphate, creatinine, and alkaline phosphatase in infants from 1 to 12 months of age.

DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an unblinded secondary analysis of 132 breastfeeding infants participating in a vitamin D3 supplementation trial (400-1600IU/d) followed prospectively until 1 year of age (NCT00381914). Serial non-fasting capillary and spot urine samples were collected for the measurement of plasma calcium, phosphate, creatinine, and alkaline phosphatase; urinary calcium, phosphate and creatinine (DxC600 Beckman Coulter); and whole-blood ionized calcium (ABL 725 Radiometer). All visits were conducted at McGill University in Montréal, Canada.

RESULTS: All analytes changed significantly over time (p<0.05), but there was no effect of sex. From 1 to 12 months, values decreased for whole-blood ionized calcium; plasma calcium, phosphate, and alkaline phosphatase; and urinary calcium:creatinine. Plasma creatinine increased. For some analytes, particularly calcium and alkaline phosphatase, values were often above the 'typical' adult or older child reference limits. Smoothed centile curves (LMS method) were developed to fill existing gaps…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 132 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free