Evidence Hub

Effects of romosozumab on bone strength around a pedicle screw as evaluated by biomechanical computed tomography-based virtual stress tests in postmenopausal women

Keaveny TM, Oates M, Betah D, Shi Y, Timoshanko J, Lee DC, Bydon M, Krohn K et al.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2026

90 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for complications after spinal fusion surgery. Romosozumab, a sclerostin inhibitor, is approved for treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high fracture risk.

PURPOSE: Here we investigated the theoretical effects of romosozumab on changes in vertebral strength around virtually-implanted pedicle screws, using biomechanical computed tomography (BCT).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This retrospective secondary analysis utilized CT scans from 2 randomized clinical trials of osteoporosis drug treatments in postmenopausal women: a phase 2 trial (12-month romosozumab vs placebo vs teriparatide) in women with low bone mineral density (BMD) and a phase 3 trial (12-month romosozumab followed by 12-month alendronate vs 24-month alendronate alone) in women with osteoporosis.

PATIENT SAMPLE: Subsets of 82 patients from the phase 2 trial who received subcutaneous romosozumab 210 mg/mo, placebo, or subcutaneous teriparatide 20 μg/d and 90 patients from the phase 3 trial were included in respective imaging substudies. Patients from the substudies in the present analysis had to have baseline and ≥1 postbaseline BCT measurement at Month 12 in the phase 2 trial, and at Months 6, 12, and 24 in the phase 3 trial.

OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoints were percent changes (follow-up vs baseline) in shear bone strength and volume of failed tissue compared between treatments; the secondary endpoint was percent change from baseline in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 90 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free