Evidence Hub

Bone health and predictors of 15-year mortality in a physically active population

Juan A, Frontera G, Cacheda AP, Ibáñez M, Narváez J, Marí B, Nolla JM

Reumatologia clinica, 2022

561 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse determinants of mortality at 15 years in a population over 60 years of age and physically active.

METHODS: This is a prospective longitudinal study. After 15 years of participating in an active ageing programme, participants were contacted by telephone to verify their state of health and to determine whether in that time they had had any fractures.

RESULTS: 561 individuals over 60 years of age were included, 82% of whom were women. Only differences in densitometric data, FRAX values and history of previous fracture at baseline characteristics were found between the group that died at 15 years and the group that remained alive. The only variables that were related to mortality risk were the basal data of the densitometric t-score (OR = .50, P < .001) and history of fracture in any location (OR = 2.44, P < .033).

CONCLUSIONS: The value of bone mineral density could be considered as a useful biomarker to calculate the risk of mortality in people over 60 years old with a physically active lifestyle.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 561 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free