Evidence Hub

Bone Mineral Density Distribution Curves in Spanish Adults With Down Syndrome

Costa R, Gullón A, De Miguel R, de Asúa DR, Bautista A, García C, Suarez C, Castañeda S et al.

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 2018

297 participants

Abstract

According to reports from small-sized case series, adults with Down syndrome (DS) appear to have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than the general population. The objective of our study was to further characterize the bone mass acquisition curve in an adult DS population. This is a retrospective study of 297 adults with DS from the Adult Down Syndrome Outpatient Clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Madrid, Spain, who underwent a bone densitometry (Hologic QDR-4500W), for clinical purposes between January 2010 and June 2015. The mean age of our sample population was 34 yr (±10.9); 51% were women. Bone mass peak was reached earlier and was lower than the general population (around 20-25 yr), with almost parallel curves. The mean BMD was 0.715 ± 0.12 g/cm2 in femoral neck (FN) and 0.872 ± 0.11 g/cm2 in lumbar spine (LS). According to FN scores, 52% of the subjects were classified as osteopenic and 18% as osteoporotic. According to LS scores, frequencies were 54% and 25%, respectively. BMD was considered inadequate for the age (Z-score < -2 standard deviation) in 18% of the subjects at FN and 40% at LS. BMD at LS was significantly lower in males than in females (52% vs 38%, p < 0.001). Male DS subjects had a 2.58-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.57-4.25) higher risk of developing reduced BMD at LS than females. Persons with DS reach the bone mass peak earlier and this bone mass is lower than the general population. Among subjects with DS, male gender is a risk factor for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 297 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free