Evidence Hub

Long-term trabecular bone score and bone mineral density changes in Chinese antiretroviral-treated HIV-infected individuals

Guan W, Pan W, Yu W, Cao W, Lin Q, Zhang Z, Song X, Li Y et al.

Archives of osteoporosis, 2021

68 participants

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This is the first 5-year analysis among persons with HIV (PWH) that reports both trabecular bone score (TBS), which is a novel index that estimates bone microarchitecture, and bone mineral density (BMD) over time to evaluate the long-term impact of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on bone health.

PURPOSE: HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD). This study aims to evaluate long-term changes in trabecular bone score (TBS), a novel index that estimates bone microarchitecture, and BMD among Chinese persons with HIV (PWH) treated with ART.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult PWH at a large tertiary care hospital in China. Patients who had a DXA scan prior to ART and at least one follow-up DXA after ART initiation were included. Subgroup analyses examined the TBS and BMD changes in patients who switch from a non-TDF-containing regimen to one containing TDF, as compared to those who did not switch.

RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-nine PWH were included. Among 68 patients ≥ 50 years, 13 patients (19.1%) had a normal BMD but partially degraded or degraded TBS. The mean percent decrease in lumbar spine (LS) BMD nadired at 48 weeks after ART initiation and then gradually improved. Percent decrease in femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) BMD nadired at 96 weeks and remained stably low thereafter. After switch to a TDF-containing regimen, only percent change in TH BMD was significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 68 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free