Evidence Hub

Association between urine albumin to creatinine ratio and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study

Oumer KS, Liu Y, Charkos TG, Yang S

Irish journal of medical science, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies on the association between urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) and bone mineral density (BMD) are still controversial.

AIMS: This study investigated the association between ACR and BMD in the general US population.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study identified 2007 individuals aged 40 or above years with complete and valid data on urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) and femoral neck, total femur and lumbar spine BMD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2014. ACR was directly measured with established methods. BMDs were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After adjusting for multiple covariates, we used general linear model (GLM) to compare the mean of BMD between the quartiles of ACR.

RESULTS: The mean age of participants in this study was 54.6 ± 11.3 years; 52.6% of them were female. ACR was negatively associated with BMD at femoral neck, total femur and lumbar spine (all P 0.05)).

CONCLUSION: ACR was negatively associated with femoral neck BMD in the general US population. Future studies are warranted to confirm our results.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free