Evidence Hub

The relationship between uric acid and total femur bone mineral density in hypertensive and non-hypertensive populations

Su Y, Ding N, Zhou Y, Yang G, Chai X

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022

13,108 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the association between uric acid (UA) and total femur bone mineral density (BMD) in hypertensive and non-hypertensive groups.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 13,108 participants in the NHANES database, including 4,679 hypertensive and 8,429 non-hypertensive subjects. A weighted multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between UA and total femur BMD.

RESULTS: In the hypertensive group, the relationship between UA and total femur BMD was positive [β, 3.02 (95% CI, -0.44 to 6.48), p = 0.0962). In the non-hypertensive group, the association was significantly positive [β, 5.64 (95% CI, 2.06-9.22), p = 0.0038]. In gender-stratified analysis, UA was analyzed as a continuous variable and a categorical variable (quartile). The significantly positive association was present in both the hypertensive male group [β, 5.10 (95% CI, 0.98-9.21), p for trend = 0.0042] and non-hypertensive male group [β, 10.63 (95% CI, 6.32-14.94), p for trend = 0.0001]. A smooth curve fitting showed that in the hypertensive male group, the relationship between UA and total femur BMD was an inverted U-shaped curve. In the hypertensive female group, the relationship was basically negative. In the non-hypertensive population, the relationship between UA and total femur BMD was an inverted U curve in both men and women.

CONCLUSION: In the hypertensive male group, the association between UA and total femur BMD was an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 13,108 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free