Evidence Hub

Bone density in women receiving Norplant implants for contraception

Intaraprasert S, Taneepanichskul S, Theppisai U, Chaturachinda K

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 1997

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether long-term Norplant uses is associated with changes in bone density. The study group consisted of forty one healthy women aged 19-42 years who had used Norplant for 31.1 +/- 11.2 months with a minimum period of 12 months. Fifty current IUD users constituted the control group. The bone density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the non dominant distal and ultradistal forearm. Serum estradiol was measured by microparticle enzyme immunoassay technique. Age, parity, income, weight, height and body mass index (BMI) of both groups were no differences. Our analysis did not find any differences in bone mineral density of distal forearm and ultradistal forearm between Norplant and IUD users (95% CI -0.01, -0.03 and -0.02, 0.02 respectively). Serum estradiol was not different in the two groups (95% CI -24.9, 110). This study revealed that the Norplant implants do not have any adverse effect on bone mineral density.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free