Evidence Hub

A loosening prosthesis in a dialysis patient

Cailleaux PE, Benarbia S, Allard G, Ureña-Torres P, Cohen-Solal M

Clinical kidney journal, 2020

Abstract

A haemodialysis patient with periprosthetic fractures and a history of corticosteroid use was referred for assessment for bone mineral disorders. Mixed renal osteodystrophy was diagnosed following a bone biopsy. Correction for vitamin D insufficiency did not improve the clinical signs, which prompted a potential diagnosis of hypophosphataemic osteomalacia to be considered. No causes for hypophosphataemia were found, except for phosphate dietary restrictions. Phosphorus supplementation was administered, resulting in an upturn in bone biochemical and histological parameters and increased bone mineral density, thus confirming the diagnosis of hypophosphataemic osteomalacia due to low phosphate intake. Characteristic features related to this diagnosis are shown from three repeated bone biopsies performed during the course of patient follow-up.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free