Evidence Hub

Spatial distribution and differences of stroke occurrence in the Rhone department of France (STROKE 69 cohort)

Freyssenge J, Renard F, Khoury CE, Derex L, Termoz A, Chakir A, Douplat M, Bravant E et al.

Scientific reports, 2020

110,000 participants

Abstract

In France, 110,000 patients are admitted to hospital per year for stroke. Even though the relationship between stroke and risk factors such as low socio-economic status is well known, research in the spatial distribution (SD) of stroke as a contributing risk factor is less documented. Understanding the geographic differences of the disease may improve stroke prevention. In this study, a statistical spatial analysis was performed using a French cohort (STROKE 69) to describe spatial inequalities in the occurrence of stroke. STROKE 69 was a cohort study of 3,442 patients, conducted in the Rhône department of France, from November 2015 to December 2016. The cohort included all consecutive patients aged 18 years or older, with a likelihood of acute stroke within 24 hours of symptoms onset. Patients were geolocated, and incidence standardized rates ratio were estimated. SD models were identified using global spatial autocorrelation analysis and cluster detection methods. 2,179 patients were selected for analysis with spatial autocorrelation methods, including 1,467 patients with stroke, and 712 with a transient ischemic attack (TIA). Within both cluster detection methods, spatial inequalities were clearly visible, particularly in the northern region of the department and western part of the metropolitan area where rates were higher. Geographic methods for SD analysis were suitable tools to explain the spatial occurrence of stroke and identified potential spatial inequalities.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 110,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free