Evidence Hub

Spirituality and spiritual care in palliative and terminal illness: a systematic review and epistemic meta-analysis from physicians' hermeneutic and bioethical perspective

Dorenbaum-Fastlicht A, Castañeda I, Guevara-López UM, Altamirano-Bustamante MM

BMC palliative care, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spirituality is a fundamental aspect of palliative care; however, it remains insufficiently addressed by physicians, despite patient’s expressed preferences and substantial evidence supporting its benefits. This systematic review explores the reason behind this persistent gap, focusing on the sociological and axiological factors influencing physician engagement with spiritual care. AIM: To develop a spirituality operative definition in the frame of healthcare and simultaneously identify and analyze the (value—based) axiological and sociocultural factors that influence physicians’ engagement with spiritual care to terminally ill patients. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, BIREME) were searched up to September 2023. Studies were included based on their examination of physicians’ perspectives on spiritual care in palliative settings. Thematic synthesis was performed using Atlas.ti guided by Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutic framework and Echeverría’s axiology or values system. Quality appraisal was conducted using cross functional approach. RESULTS: Physicians’ engagement with spiritual care is shaped by their own spirituality, including encompassing personal values (e.g., compassion, respect), individual beliefs and self-awareness regarding their own well-being and transcendent dimension of clinical practice. Additional factors include communication skills, established clinical routines and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free