Evidence Hub

Enhancing Access to Family Planning Services in Uganda Through Community Health Extension Workers: Protocol for a Pilot Evaluation

Kabwijamu L, Kabwama SN, Makumbi F, Achola R, Tusubira A, Nabukeera S, Nalwadda CK

JMIR research protocols, 2025

24 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Uganda, 22% of all women of reproductive age have an unmet need for family planning services. Access to contraceptive services, especially long-term reversible contraceptives such as implants, remains a challenge. The number of trained health providers is also not sufficient to address the needs for contraception. The Uganda Ministry of Health implemented a community-based implant provision pilot project where community health extension workers (CHEWs) were trained and accredited to insert implants at community level.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the implementation and acceptability of stakeholders toward task shifting the provision of family planning implants to CHEWs in Uganda.

METHODS: The evaluation will use a cross-sectional design using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative component will use a noninferiority design, whereas the qualitative component will use a descriptive approach. The noninferiority design involves a comparison of the competence of the currently authorized cadre to offer the service to the proposed cadre (CHEWs). Compared with a randomized controlled trial, the noninferiority design is more appropriate for this evaluation because the CHEWs and the authorized cadre are not comparable in terms of level of training and competencies. The authorized cadre has gone through formal training, which is not comparable with the training the CHEWs have received, and so the comparison is such that the competencies of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free