Evidence Hub

Determinants of levofloxacin prophylaxis failure in high-risk haematology patients: a prospective study integrating resistant colonization and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment

Boşnak C, Metan G, Zarakolu P, Karakulak EA, Pınar A, Göker H, Roberts JA, Hernandez-Mitre MP et al.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the clinical and microbiological factors associated with the failure of levofloxacin prophylaxis in high-risk haematology patients, with a particular focus on the attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target. Methods This prospective case–control study evaluated adult high-risk haematology patients receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis (750 mg/day) during neutropenia. Analyses were performed at the episode level. Individual levofloxacin exposure was described using a population PK model, with the PK/PD target defined as fAUC0–24/MIC ≥80. Surveillance cultures were used to characterize Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) colonization and resistance profiles. Results A total of 120 neutropenic episodes were analysed. Profound neutropenia was independently associated with prophylaxis failure (OR: 4.17; 95% CI: 1.70–10.2; P = 0.002], whereas achievement of fAUC/MIC ≥80 was independently associated with a reduced risk of failure (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02–0.62; P = 0.012). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified fAUC/MIC ≥48.46 as the Youden-optimal cutoff (sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 38.3%; Youden J = 0.243). Achievement of this cutoff was also independently associated with a reduced risk of prophylaxis failure (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.083–0.803; P = 0.019). Target non-attainment was strongly associated with levofloxacin-resistant GNB colonization, indicating that PK/PD failure was predominantly MIC driven. Conclusions…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free