Double-blind cross over treatment with mesterolone and placebo of subfertile oligozoospermic men value of testicular biopsy
Abstract
Fifty-nine carefully selected oligozoospermic men were randomly treated with mesterolone (75 mg/day) or placebo to improve fertility. After 6 months the medication was changed from mesterolone to placebo or vice versa. Fourteen pregnancies occurred, 7 under mesterolone and 7 under placebo. A testicular biopsy score was of prognostic value: the men who impregnated their partner had a significantly higher mean score than the men who did not fertilize. No other significant differences between these two groups of men were observed. Mesterolone had no significant influence other than placebo.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Evolution of testosterone treatment over 25 years: symptom responses, endocrine profiles and cardiovascular changes
- Vertebrate hormones influence on the reproduction of Biomphalaria glabrata and on Schistosoma mansoni infection (author's transl)
- Azoospermia associated with a mutation in the ligand-binding domain of an androgen receptor displaying normal ligand binding, but defective trans-activation
- Successful treatment of methimazole-induced severe aplastic anaemia in a diabetic patient with other co-morbidities
- The management of male subfertility by in vitro fertilisation techniques
- Rapid determination of anti-estrogens by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry in urine: Method validation and application to real samples
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.