Evidence Hub

Osteoporosis in male hypogonadism: responses to androgen substitution differ among men with primary and secondary hypogonadism

Schubert M, Bullmann C, Minnemann T, Reiners C, Krone W, Jockenhövel F

Hormone research, 2003

53 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No randomized study exists comparing the effects of different modes of androgen substitution on bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, trial assigning 53 hypogonadal men to the following treatment groups: mesterolone 100 mg p.o. daily, testosterone undecanoate 160 mg p.o. daily, testosterone enanthate 250 mg i.m. every 21 days, or a single subcutaneous implantation of 1,200 mg crystalline testosterone. The BMD was determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

RESULTS: At baseline, men with secondary hypogonadism (n = 33) had a lower BMD (-1.52 +/- 0.23 SDS; Z-scores) than men with primary hypogonadism (n = 20, -0.87 +/- 0.23 SDS, p < 0.01). In men with primary hypogonadism, the BMD increased dose dependently (crystalline testosterone +7.0 +/- 1.3%, testosterone enanthate +4.8 +/- 0.2%, testosterone undecanoate +3.4 +/- 2.5%, mesterolone +0.8 +/- 1.6%) after 6 months of therapy. Only secondary hypogonadal men treated with testosterone enanthate experienced an increase of the BMD.

CONCLUSIONS: In primary hypogonadal men the BMD responds dose dependently to testosterone substitution, whereas in secondary hypogonadism only testosterone enanthate treatment significantly increased the BMD.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 53 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free