Evidence Hub

Determination of anabolic steroids in dried blood using microsampling and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to a testosterone gel administration study

Chang WC, Cowan DA, Walker CJ, Wojek N, Brailsford AD

Journal of chromatography. A, 2020

Abstract

Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) have been the most commonly abused substances taken by not only professional sportsmen but also recreational bodybuilders. The detection of micro-dose testosterone (T) misuse is particularly challenging as it possesses pseudo-endogenous origin and is sometimes impossible to be identified in urine samples. Dried blood (DB) obtained by finger pricking has been proven to be an alternative matrix for better correlating to physiological responses. Moreover, the introduction of the volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) technology allows overcoming some major limitations of spotting blood onto a filter paper card. In this work, a fast and sensitive GC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the quantification of AAS in DB collected by means of VAMS. T and the eight top abused synthetic AAS, namely nandrolone, boldenone, mesterolone, drostanolone, metenolone, metandienone, oxandrolone, and dehydrochloromethyl T were selected as the target analytes. The method based on VAMS exhibited good precision, accuracy as well as stability, and superior extraction recoveries over the punched DB spots reported in the literature. The chromatographic separation was achieved within 6.4 min and the detection limit is as little as 50 fg (i.e. able to detect 0.10 ng mL-1 in 20 μL of DB). Confirmed by forty real blood samples, the Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the VAMS DB could be employed for quantifying blood T level in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free