Evidence Hub

Persistent low-normal bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with different curve severity: A longitudinal study from presentation to beyond skeletal maturity and peak bone mass

Xue Li, V. Hung, F. W. Yu, A. Hung, B. Ng, J. Cheng, Tsz-Ping Lam, B. Yip

Bone, 2019

194 participants · 28 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Low bone mineral status has been reported in patients first presented with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We aimed to study whether low-normal bone mineral density (BMD) is persistent among AIS girls during puberty and at peak bone mass, and whether if such persistence is associated with curve severity and differed from healthy controls.

METHOD

This prospective longitudinal study comprised 550 AIS girls and 194 healthy control subjects followed from 1997 till 2016. Low-normal BMD was defined as z-standardized bone mineral density (z-BMD) of bilateral femoral neck ≤ -1. Markov Chain 2-stages analysis was conducted to investigate the low-normal BMD transition rate. Linear mixed-effects model and Bland-Altman plot were used to investigate whether low-normal BMD is persistent among a subgroup of AIS patients that reached peak bone mass.

RESULTS

The average z-BMD were comparable between AIS cohort and controls at 11 years old (-0.532 vs -0.602), but at 19 years old z-BMD worsened among AIS subjects (-0.860) while controls z-BMD improved (-0.455). During growth period until skeletal maturity, persistence of low-normal BMD was high in both cohorts (>80%) and the AIS group with severe curve presented 100% persistence. Subgroup analysis revealed that z-BMD of AIS patients at skeletal maturity and peak bone mass were highly correlated (r2 = 0.905) and with good agreement.

CONCLUSION

AIS patients had poorer BMD that is associated with curve severity and more likely…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 194 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free