Evidence Hub

Bone mineral density deficits in individuals born preterm persist through young adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis of DXA studies

Brittany M. Wilson, Adam B. Wilson, Megan Kraemer, Rakhee M. Bowker, Aloka L. Patel, D. R. Sumner

Bone, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Individuals born preterm are at increased risk for bone deficits given that the majority of skeletal mineral accrual occurs during the final gestational trimester. It is unclear how preterm birth affects bone density with aging or if individuals born preterm have increased rates of osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the current data on bone mineral content and density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at any time across the lifespan after preterm birth in generally healthy, appropriate size for gestational age individuals. Three databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL, were searched using keywords related to preterm birth and skeletal mineralization. Total body, lumbar spine, and femoral neck were the most frequently reported DXA measurement sites. A total of 39 studies (145 comparisons) were included in the meta-analyses, with bone outcomes measured within days of birth through about 30 years of age, depending on the measurement site. Preterm birth was associated with reduced bone mineral content and density. The largest total body bone deficits were observed in preterm individuals who were less than one year of age, with greater variability observed during childhood and adolescence. Individuals born preterm in the oldest cohort (17–30 years) maintained deficits in bone mineral density as they approached the age of peak bone mass. Importantly, there were no DXA studies of preterm individuals beyond 30 years of age, so…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free