Treatment-related changes in total hip bone mineral density are applicable to trials of varied study designs and to drugs with differing mechanisms of action: meta-regression results from the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE study
Abstract
Abstract Emerging anti-osteoporosis therapies might present varied mechanisms of action and demand active control groups or sequential therapies due to ethical or mechanistic reasons. We previously showed a strong association between treatment-induced changes in total hip BMD (THBMD) at 12 and 24 mo and reduced fracture risk in placebo-controlled trials. We determined the surrogate threshold effect: the minimum THBMD difference (active-placebo) in a trial that would predict a significant reduction in fracture risk in trials. In this analysis, we investigated whether these associations are influenced by drug mechanism of action or trial design, including treatment with an anabolic followed by an antiresorptive compared to active control or placebo. We analyzed individual patient data from 22 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (17 antiresorptive, 3 PTH analogs, 1 odanacatib, and 1 romosozumab placebo-controlled phase), and 3 trials of an anabolic followed by an antiresorptive (1 PTH analog and 2 romosozumab). We established treatment-related differences in THBMD changes, calculated fracture risk reductions for radiologic vertebral and all clinical fractures, and estimated study-level associations between these features via meta-regression. We found consistent associations between treatment-related THBMD changes and fracture risk reduction across different drug mechanisms and trial designs. Among placebo-controlled trials, the r2 values for vertebral fractures were 0.73 (p =…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Erratum to: The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations
- Association between obesity and risk of fracture, bone mineral density and bone quality in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Dietary Patterns in Relation to Low Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Association of obesity with bone mineral density and osteoporosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Falls, fractures, and areal bone mineral density in older adults with sarcopenic obesity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
- Exercise training and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies with emphasis on potential moderators
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.