Evidence Hub

Prognosis of dental implants in patients with low bone density: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Iman Abdel Wahab Radi, W. Ibrahim, S. M. S. Iskandar, Nouran Abdelnabi

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print), 2018

1,071 participants · 47 citations

Abstract

Statement of problem. Osteoporosis is a risk factor for implant success. Evidence for the prognosis of dental implants in patients with osteoporosis is still unclear. Purpose. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare implant success in patients with low versus normal bone density and to evaluate special techniques used to enhance implant success in these patients. Material and methods. Searches were performed electronically in 4 databases (PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane, and Grey Literature) through July 2017 and manually to identify studies addressing the subject. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies were included. Results. Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1071 participants. Seven studies compared implant success in low and normal bone density, and 4 compared implant success in special and conventional techniques of implant placement. The risk of bias in the assessment of cohort studies was critical; of nonrandomized clinical trials, serious; and of randomized clinical trials, high. The meta‐analysis showed no significant difference between implant survival in patients with low and normal bone density 5 years after implant placement. Conclusions. Implant survival in patients with low bone density seems to be feasible with special precautions. Implant placement using special adopted techniques might provide equivalent implant stability, survival, and marginal bone loss to normal bone. The quality of evidence is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,071 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free