Evidence Hub

Bisphosphonates for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S. Yureneva, V. Averkova

Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of sufficient systematization of data on the use of bisphosphonates for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia prompted us to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis of publications devoted to this problem.AIM: To study the effect of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density (BMD), markers of bone metabolism and fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1140 potentially eligible articles were found in the initial publication screening. From the initially identified results, 13 studies were meta-analyzed. The design of the studies selected for meta-analysis was consistent with randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: On average, study bisphosphonate preparations compared with placebo increased lumbar spine BMD by 5.54 % (95 % CI 4.44–6.63, I2 = 93.65 %), total hip BMD by 4.53 % (95 % CI 3. 2–5.86, I2=96.32 %), femoral neck BMD by 3.63 % (95 % CI 1.5–5.75, I2=95.9 %), total body BMD by 3.25 % (95 % CI 2.28–4.22, I2=87.87 %), proximal femur BMD by 4.76 % (95 % CI 3.43–6.08, I2 = 88.64 %). There was a statistically significant effect of bisphosphonates on low-energy fractures (OR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.49–0.77), clinical vertebral fractures (OR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.38–0.69), and radiologically confirmed vertebral fractures (OR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.4–0.98). CONCLUSION: These results obtained allow us to conclude that bisphosphonates (alendronate, zolendronic acid, ibandronate,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free