Evidence Hub

Bone deficits in children and youth with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuwen Zheng, M. R. H. Abadi, Z. Ghafouri, S. Goes, J. Johnston, Munier A. Nour, S. Kontulainen

Bone, 2022

2,222 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Deficits in bone mineral and weaker bone structure in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may contribute to a lifelong risk of fracture. However, there is no meta-analysis comparing bone properties beyond density between children with T1D and typically developing children (TDC). This meta-analysis aimed to assess differences and related factors in bone mineral content (BMC), density, area, micro-architecture and estimated strength between children with T1D and TDC. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases, and included 36 in the meta-analysis (2222 children and youth with T1D, 2316 TDC; mean age ≤18 yrs., range 1-24). We estimated standardized mean differences (SMD) using random-effects models and explored the role of age, body size, sex ratio, disease duration, hemoglobin A1c in relation to BMC and areal density (aBMD) SMD using meta-regressions. Children and youth with T1D had lower total body BMC (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.05), aBMD (-0.30, -0.50 to -0.11); lumbar spine BMC (-0.17, -0.28 to -0.06), aBMD (-0.20, -0.32 to -0.08), bone mineral apparent density (-0.30, -0.48 to -0.13); femoral neck aBMD (-0.21, -0.33 to -0.09); distal radius and tibia trabecular density (-0.38, -0.64 to -0.12 and -0.35, -0.51 to -0.18, respectively) and bone volume fraction (-0.33, -0.56 to -0.09 and -0.37, -0.60 to -0.14, respectively); distal tibia trabecular thickness (-0.41, -0.67 to -0.16); and tibia shaft cortical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,222 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free